I have noticed today it is a bonanza of Sandy Hook and conspiracy terrorist related news. Yes, I wrote conspiracy “terrorist” to describe the conspiracy theorists of this world who cannot argue without inciting violence or other provocations deemed a grave nuisance towards the affected people. Thus, there are those who fall into the conspiracy theorist field and others in the conspiracy terrorist group, big difference.
We all take part in a conspiracy theory one way or the other or at one point in our lives, it’s normal. I fell for some stories, such as the 9/11 attack, where I believed for a few months it was an inside job by George W. Bush and its cronies. I fell for the conspiracy theory because deep down inside I wanted George W. Bush out of his presidency, I disliked him, and thus the conspiracy theory became a support for my cause. Nowadays, fault of being able to conclude on my own, since I do not have the capacity to investigate such event, I have to be contented with my own theory. My theory is the one where I believe the United States was truly attacked by an independent outside force, and George W. Bush took advantage of the attack to lunch the world wide fight against terrorism and conclude what his father could not accomplishing, to remove Saddam Hussein. In other words, the entire USA went to war on a person’s personal feeling. There was no weapons of mass destructions, a known fact now.
It’s my theory of the event, not factual by any means since I cannot prove it. I am allowed to say so and that’s free speech, even if some do not like it. What I am not allowed to do, in any way, shape or form, is to harass and incite any type of trouble towards the people affected by my said theories. Same goes for everyone else.
A conspiracy terrorists crosses the line between speaking one’s mind and inciting weird and violent actions. Lucy Richards from Florida is one of those extreme cases where she did not reserve her feelings of wanting someone dead. That’s beyond investigator, investigative journalism or anything else these people think they are.
The courts will never argue against free speech, but it will knock down speeches that causes upheaval based on unfounded grounds. What’s happening lately with many of these conspiracy terrorists losing in courts, is that justice is being served right.
For the record, here’s a few conspiracy terrorists.
